I think that regulators, whether it be taxis or other industries, have to take into account in doing their job that the world is changing and it’s changing for the better, and that regulations have to be modernized.In a commentary posted to its website (November 24, 2014), the Competition Bureau was also critical of the rote application of regulations and licensing requirements to innovative new software applications and business models not previously envisioned:
The Bureau understands that innovation can be disruptive to existing industries. Recent examples include the real estate and banking industries. However, in order to be successful, not only must the innovators have courage, vision, drive and patience, but markets must be receptive to those efforts.It will be interesting to see how the Ontario courts interpret Uber’s service model. The fight in Toronto is just one of many faced by Uber, which has been facing mounting legal impediments in many jurisdictions. For news reports about the injunction sought by the City of Toronto against Uber, see below: Financial Post The Globe and Mail Global Toronto The Toronto Star Summary by: Michael House
Disclaimer: This Newsletter is intended to provide readers with general information on legal developments in the areas of e-commerce, information technology and intellectual property. It is not intended to be a complete statement of the law, nor is it intended to provide legal advice. No person should act or rely upon the information contained in this newsletter without seeking legal advice.
E-TIPS is a registered trade-mark of Deeth Williams Wall LLP.